![]() |
Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - Printable Version +- SEO MotionZ Forum (https://seomotionz.com) +-- Forum: Search Engine Optimization (https://seomotionz.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Link Building (https://seomotionz.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Thread: Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? (/showthread.php?tid=5350) Pages:
1
2
|
Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - rigsby - 04-28-2019 Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? Or of low value? RE: Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - limbo - 04-28-2019 Ofcourse they are not all bad. RE: Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - mediadrug - 04-28-2019 If they comes from an authority site then why would they be bad? RE: Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - rigsby - 04-28-2019 Okay, but what kind of links are we talking about here? RE: Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - mediadrug - 04-29-2019 (04-28-2019, 06:05 PM)rigsby Wrote: Okay, but what kind of links are we talking about here? What do you mean by what kind of links? Links with good and relevant anchor texts, ofcourse. RE: Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - rigsby - 04-29-2019 So, links from images or say author's bio don't get count? RE: Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - lata21 - 04-29-2019 (04-29-2019, 04:14 PM)rigsby Wrote: So, links from images or say author's bio don't get count? Author's bio passes link juice. That I know. RE: Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - supaul - 04-29-2019 (04-29-2019, 04:14 PM)rigsby Wrote: So, links from images or say author's bio don't get count? What do you mean by image links? RE: Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - danni - 04-30-2019 OP is definitely confused here. Or, he or she doesn't know what is the context here!! RE: Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? - anush - 04-30-2019 To OP I ask why do you want web 2.0 links so bad? |