Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 8
Likes Received: 0
Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad? Or of low value?
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 456
Likes Received: 123
Ofcourse they are not all bad.
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 678
Likes Received: 174
If they comes from an authority site then why would they be bad?
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 8
Likes Received: 0
Okay, but what kind of links are we talking about here?
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 678
Likes Received: 174
(04-28-2019, 06:05 PM)rigsby Wrote: Okay, but what kind of links are we talking about here?
What do you mean by what kind of links?
Links with good and relevant anchor texts, ofcourse.
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 8
Likes Received: 0
So, links from images or say author's bio don't get count?
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 159
Likes Received: 4
(04-29-2019, 04:14 PM)rigsby Wrote: So, links from images or say author's bio don't get count?
Author's bio passes link juice. That I know.
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 709
Likes Received: 102
(04-29-2019, 04:14 PM)rigsby Wrote: So, links from images or say author's bio don't get count?
What do you mean by image links?
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 469
Likes Received: 60
OP is definitely confused here. Or, he or she doesn't know what is the context here!!
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 937
Likes Received: 78
04-30-2019, 02:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-30-2019, 02:43 PM by anush.)
To OP I ask why do you want web 2.0 links so bad?
Can a Web 2.0 site link always be bad?
![[-]](https://seomotionz.com/themes/cerulean/collapse.png)
