09-17-2019, 04:09 AM
Google says there is no wrong attribute to use except in the case of sponsored links. If a link is marked as sponsored when it's not actually part of an ad or sponsorship, then the impact will be lessened.
Google's new rel="sponsored" attribute, good or bad?
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Google's new rel="sponsored" attribute, good or bad? - by rakesh20 - 09-11-2019, 04:16 AM
RE: Google's new rel="sponsored" attribute, good or bad? - by ksmith29 - 09-11-2019, 04:22 AM
RE: Google's new rel="sponsored" attribute, good or bad? - by lata21 - 09-11-2019, 04:16 PM
RE: Google's new rel="sponsored" attribute, good or bad? - by mediamonster - 09-11-2019, 04:58 PM
RE: Google's new rel="sponsored" attribute, good or bad? - by tomsfashion2019 - 09-17-2019, 04:09 AM
RE: Google's new rel="sponsored" attribute, good or bad? - by anush - 09-17-2019, 04:02 PM
RE: Google's new rel="sponsored" attribute, good or bad? - by bpatel - 09-17-2019, 04:52 PM
RE: Google's new rel="sponsored" attribute, good or bad? - by limbo - 09-18-2019, 04:30 AM
|