While recent regulatory guidance has provided insight and opportunity for financial institutions wishing to provide cryptocurrency exchange services, significant regulatory uncertainty remains. Financial institutions will need to work to ensure they are compliant with a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape and will need to build the necessary infrastructure to manage their public and private blockchain-based assets, services and activities.
Banks should also carefully consider tax consequences associated with best cryptocurrency to buy. Unfortunately, these consequences are subject to substantial uncertainty. Most jurisdictions, including the United States, treat cryptoassets as a form of property rather than as currency. As a consequence, using cryptoassets as a medium of exchange typically requires payment of immediate tax on the gain inherent in the cryptoassets. Beyond this basic premise, a great deal remains unresolved. For example, the treatment of cryptoassets under the various mark-to-market taxation regimes banks are often subject to is unclear, as is the tax treatment of swaps and other financial instruments involving or relating to cryptoassets. There is limited guidance on issues that are unique and necessary to the functioning of cryptoassets, such as hard forks, and this guidance is not always favorable or easy to apply. [38] Finally, there is uncertainty regarding the application of valued-added taxes, property taxes and bank taxes (such as potential capital taxes) to cryptoassets. Although tax authorities will continue to clarify cryptoasset taxation, it is likely uncertainty will persist for a considerable time .