Get this. Links from atleast 8 sites (from what I have found) to the guys main site. And all the of the content in those sites are directly or indirectly produced by him. By directly I mean, written by him and indirectly means reviews or posts that are clearly paid of by him to get published.
I am sorry to say but there is nothing to report here. Writing in other sites under direct name isn't against any guidelines.
What you are accusing is that the guy has paid of other site owners to get fake reviews? In that concerned matter I will say that unless you can prove that he is paying others off, your claims are just void.
There is nothing to complain about. What 'Anush' said is right. If you can prove then only it will matter otherwise not.
And you should know that most of the sites in the internet are doing or have done the same thing. And they shall do it in the future too.
(07-04-2019, 04:26 AM)brian Wrote: [ -> ]There is nothing to complain about. What 'Anush' said is right. If you can prove then only it will matter otherwise not.
And you should know that most of the sites in the internet are doing or have done the same thing. And they shall do it in the future too.
Please be subtle Brian.
