Plain text Emails vs Rich Media Emails

[websiteee]

Since I am not the expert but in my opinion plain text email is a good strategy. Or we can simply use the logo.

[elsawoodd]

i am also for Rich Media Emails

[davidsmith21]

Rich media is defined as a broad range of interactive digital media that exhibit dynamic motion, taking advantage of enhanced sensory features such as video, audio and animation.

Plain text is a format you can choose to send your emails in. They work well for non-marketing-related content and can also give your emails a more personal feel.

[damponting44]

Plain text is a format you can choose to send your emails in. They work well for non-marketing-related content and can also give your emails a more personal feel. Rich media is defined as a broad range of interactive digital media that exhibit dynamic motion, taking advantage of enhanced sensory features such as video, audio and animation.

[richardmsmith]

Rich media emails: It has coding involved and you can include a various picture and video formats in HTML emails, they have a better visual appeal.
Plain Text emails: it is just plain text sent to the recipient without any coding, template design, links, images, etc.

[tousifislam209t]

For me, rich media content is best. Rich contents are interactive and visually pleasant. But it doesn't matter plain or rich. As long as you have relevant and quality content. I have found a blog on this topic.

[mandiradebnath]

When I try to approach for guest blogging or any link building mail, The link I put there, automatically takes the featured image of that page. So, should I remove the image? I want to know what will be the impression of this type of mail body?

[martinsmith]

Plain text emails feel more personal and look like they were sent from a dedicated representative Although plain text emails perform better than HTML emails in general, there are instances where your business may want a well-designed, media-rich, HTML email.