Web 2.0 site links, they really worth it?

[kaplan]

Web 2.0 site links, are they really worth the time and effort?

[master11]

They are a complete waste of time if you ask me.

[frank]

Many people will say that its worth it. But the truth is that they are just worthless. They don't arise much authority so they don't pass any link juice.

[sinelogixtech]

The term "Web 2.0" was first used in January 1999 by Darcy DiNucci, an information architecture consultant. In her article, "Fragmented Future", DiNucci writes:[4]

The Web we know now, which loads into a browser window in essentially static screenfuls, is only an embryo of the Web to come. The first glimmerings of Web 2.0 are beginning to appear, and we are just starting to see how that embryo might develop

[wittycookie]

In past, web 2.0 webpage was utilized to make backlinks yet now they are not successful as before in light of the fact that individuals make numerous records and than put low-quality substance on them and endeavor to get backlinks from that point so attempt to maintain a strategic distance from it.

The present SEO is about Quality substance, on the off chance that you have great activity on your web 2.0 blog and furthermore have great quality substance then it might be useful.

[supaul]

For all I know that they can get you penalized.

[RH-Calvin]

Web2.0 links are helpful to build backlinks for your website and also share your content in search engines. They help to rank keywords higher in search engines.